Power Industry News

Find here quality News, Articles, Stories, Case Studies, Latest Information about World of Power Industry

COAL ASH MANAGEMENT

Posted by admin2 0 Comment

Best Management Practices for Coal Ash Ponds

The unfortunate coal ash spill at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA’s) Kingston Fossil Plant that occurred on December 22 has heightened national awareness of the problems associated with utilities’ coal ash surface impoundments if they are not properly maintained.

Regulations governing coal combustion waste disposal vary considerably from state to state.

At this time there are no national standards governing the maintenance of coal ash surface impoundments and their retention dikes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not consider the waste “hazardous.” Some environmental groups, including the Environmental Integrity Project, argue that even though coal ash is characterized as nonhazardous waste by the EPA, the waste at some facilities has been found to contain harmful metals such as lead and arsenic. In contrast, industry groups have been quick to respond to complaints about the lack of appropriate regulation of coal ash surface impoundments (see sidebar, “Kingston’s King-size Mess”).

“What’s been interesting to me is this fiction that since coal ash is not regulated by EPA as hazardous waste, there’s no regulation at all,” said Jim Roewer, executive director of the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group in a recent press release. “That’s simply not true. Many states have very tough programs.”

Edison Electric Institute spokesman Dan Riedinger, whose association represents several major U.S. utilities, said in a statement made in January that his group opposes a hazardous waste designation for coal ash but added, “It’s too early to rule out other options that can help utilities improve their management practices and provide the public with the reassurance it needs in the wake of TVA.”

Regulations governing coal combustion waste disposal vary considerably from state to state. Some states do little, some require companies to obtain discharge permits, and others establish rigorous water monitoring rules. Many states also lack regulations governing the maintenance of the coal ash ponds.

Illinois is an example of a state with a regulatory program dealing with the maintenance of coal ash ponds. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency has inspectors who scrutinize the ponds and landfills where coal ash waste is stored, according to an article published by The Southern Wire Services on January 15. However, despite the requirements, there are no regulations in place in Illinois that stipulate how frequently groundwater near the old, unlined ash ponds must be monitored. Instead, each site is monitored on a “case by case” basis, said Darin LeCrone, a manager in Illinois EPA’s bureau of water permit section.

One Utility’s Maintenance Program
One leading utility—Southern Company—has established management practices related to coal ash surface impoundments that are working effectively. Southern Company operates coal-fired power plants in four states: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi.

Southern Company’s coal combustion product (CCP) management practices are in compliance with ach state’s unique regulatory scheme, according to a written statement released on February 2 to POWER by Steve Higginbottom, a member of Southern Company’s media relations department. The company’s CCPs are collected as part of the processes to remove pollutants from air emissions so that power plants comply with air quality regulations.

“Southern Company currently inspects the ash surface impoundments at our coal-fired power plants at least every other year by dam safety engineers, and plant personnel conduct inspections at least every other week,” he said. “Southern Company has a routine inspection program in place to ensure that our containment structures are secure. In light of recent events, Southern Company is reviewing our inspection programs to identify any improvements or modifications that might be appropriate.”

“Southern Company realizes the seriousness of an ash surface impoundment failure and has a robust program in place to ensure the integrity of our containment systems,” Higginbottom stated. “In addition to this program, Southern Company is taking action to confirm the integrity of our surface impoundments and to evaluate our CCP management practices.

“Southern Company currently owns and operates 22 plants with active surface impoundments used to store fly ash and bottom ash at our coal-fired power plants,” said Higginbottom. In 2000, the EPA concluded, after nearly 20 years of study, that coal ash does not warrant hazardous waste regulation under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and that states should continue to be the primary environmental regulators for coal ash management, he pointed out.

CCPs contain trace amounts of metals—such as arsenic, mercury, and lead—that occur naturally in the coal that Southern Company burns to produce electricity, but their concentrations in the ash are not comparable to levels in substances that are required to be regulated as hazardous.

“The states in which we operate have the authority to impose additional restrictions if necessary to protect human health or the environment,” Higginbottom said. “Southern Company works closely with each of its state regulatory agencies to ensure that we meet the requirements for environmental protection that the agencies establish. In situations where site specific issues have been a concern, state regulatory agencies assess the site to determine what, if any, additional actions or requirements are needed.”

Southern Company will continue to comply with all existing and future state and federal regulatory requirements and is continually seeking to increase beneficial use of CCP that it generates, he emphasized. Coal ash surface impoundments have successfully been in operation at many of his company’s coal-fired plants for decades, Higginbottom noted. Ash surface impoundments provide a controlled means for containing the solid remains of coal burned to produce electricity, and they represent standard practice across the coal-fired power plant industry.

Any discharges from an ash surface impoundment are subject to wastewater permit limits under the Clean Water Act’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, including pollutant limits and monitoring and reporting requirements, which are submitted to the appropriate regulatory agency, typically monthly.

“Across the country, the by-products of coal combustion are used in beneficial ways instead of being stored,” he said. “Southern Company has an active program to implement this approach. Currently, 30% to 35% of the coal combustion byproducts from Southern Company coal plants are used in beneficial ways (used in concrete, road building, etc.).”

Kingston king_size Mess.JPG

Kingston Plant befor.jpg

This aerial photograph of the Kingston Plant and surrounding areas was taken prior to the ash slide of December 22, 2008.

Kingston Plant befor.jpg

This photograph of the same area was taken on December 23, 2008, the day after the earthen containment walls holding more than five million cubic yards fly ash and bottom ash sludge
failed.

Looking at the Example of SMCRA Practices
On January 14, U.S. House of Representatives Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-W.V.) introduced legislation requiring federal standards to regulate the engineering of coal ash impoundments.

If enacted by Congress, the proposed Coal Ash Reclamation and Environmental Safety Act of 2009 H.R. 493) would impose uniform federal design, engineering, and performance standards on coal ash impoundments to avoid a repeat of the damage done by the Kingston pond breach. The legislation,which requires minimum design and stability standards for all surface impoundments constructed to hold coal ash, draws upon the regulatory model for impoundments that is used for coal slurry management under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977(SMCRA).

The majority of coal ash, which is a by-product of the combustion of coal at electric utility power plants, is deposited in impoundments, landfills, or mines. By comparison, coal slurry is one of the main refuse streams from the treatment of raw coal when it is mined.

As mentioned earlier, there are currently no federal standards for coal ash impoundments, as exist under SMCRA for coal slurry. Instead, such impoundments are constructed and maintained under a patchwork of state requirements, or on a voluntary basis. Requirements for coal slurry impoundments under SMCRA that would be made applicable to coal ash impoundments under H.R.

493 would cover aspects of design, construction, operations, and closure, including:

■ Regulations detailing the engineering and stability of the
embankment.

■ Regulations requiring all applications for an impoundment to
have a foundation investigation to determine design requirements for stability.

■ Each design plan must include a geotechnical investigation of the embankment foundation area.

■ Each impoundment plan must include a survey describing the potential effect on the structure from subsidence of the subsurface strata resulting from past mining operations in the area.

■ Plans for impoundments must be reviewed by a geologist or an engineer.

■ Regulations requiring that a qualified engineer, with experience in construction of impoundments, inspect each impoundment regularly during construction, upon completion of construction, and periodically thereafter.

“For those states that do not already have careful standards for coal ash disposal, my legislation will require immediate attention to the shocking gaps in coal ash management. The American public and our environment simply cannot afford to wait any longer to rein in the hazards posed by the shoddy and irresponsible coal ash disposal practices that currently exist,” Rahall said in a press release issued by his office.

Rahall has a long history of working to regulate coal ash waste. In 1980, Rahall and former Representative Tom Bevill of Alabama successfully offered an amendment to what became the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1980 requiring the EPA to determine how to regulate coal ash. Yet, 29 years later, the agency has chosen not to control how coal ash is stored or used or to classify coal ash waste as hazardous.

A 2006 National Academy of Sciences study initiated at Rahall’s request, along with a 2007 Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources oversight hearing, pointed to the pressing need for a federal regulatory regime governing the disposal of coal ash, whether in impoundments, landfills, or mines.

Down the Road
There is a growing possibility that the EPA will begin regulating coal ash surface impoundments in the near future. Matthew Hale, who directs the EPA’s solid waste office, said in a statement released in January that, although the agency has yet to issue formal coal ash regulations, “We will be bringing this forward very quickly to reach a decision on the path forward, and that’s the time when we’ll be able to have a timetable. Clearly, the dam failure at TVA puts a sense of urgency on the issue of addressing the stability of the dams.”

On Jan. 14, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, asked new EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson during her confirmation hearing what she would do to police coal ash ponds and other storage sites that have gone unregulated. During the hearing, Jackson pledged to conduct an immediate inventory of the deposits, if confirmed, and added, “The EPA currently has, and has in the past, assessed its regulatory options, and I think it is time to re-ask those questions.”

Whether operating in states with existing coal ash regulations or in states without standards, personnel at U.S. power plants that have coal ash ponds need to ensure that they are properly managing their facilities’ surface impoundments, maintaining the integrity of the retention dikes, and taking strong measures to prevent accidental releases of coal ash waste.

Categories: Coal plant, power plants

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Popular Posts

PV Sales in the U.S.

Solar panel prices have taken a 10% tumble since October ...

Voith Turbo BHS Getr

Voith Turbo BHS Getriebe, a leading turbo gearbox manufacturer worldwide, ...

Clean Power at the B

Clean Power at the Black Sea’s Shore (Source: Siemens Energy) Siemens ...

Wärtsilä developin

Wärtsilä one of leading companies in research programme for developing ...

Conversions in Every

converted Mirrlees Blackstone K9 Major diesel engine. The conversion work ...

Sponsors

  • RSS
  • Forums
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Delicious
  • Unifyer
  • Pinterest